At the end of every year Time magazine produces their choice for person of the year. This year Pope Francis wins the prize. Edward Snowden, the technician who exposed government snooping was the runner up.
What does the choice of Pope Francis reveal about the media masters who made the choice? This article
from the Huffington Post
shows how many thought Mr Snowden should have been chosen, while London’s Daily Telegraph
quotes the Time
magazine writers with the tired angle that Pope Francis has reformed the legalistic, hide bound church of Benedict XVI and John Paul II: “People weary of the endless parsing of sexual ethics, the buck-passing infighting over lines of authority when all the while (to borrow from Milton), ‘the hungry Sheep look up, and are not fed.’ In a matter of months, Francis has elevated the healing mission of the church—the church as servant and comforter of hurting people in an often harsh world—above the doctrinal police work so important to his recent predecessors.”
The Time magazine writers reflect the sentimental spirit of the age: that there is nothing important about doctrine and discipline, but everything important about being nice and friendly. That Christians are often perceived as being legalistic, harsh and exclusive cannot be denied, but it is in the interests of the enemies of the Christian faith to exaggerate the alleged harshness of Pope Benedict XVI and Bl. Pope John Paul II while downplaying the tough words of Pope Francis.
While all Catholics rejoice in the widespread popularity of Pope Francis, many Catholics are also dubious of the motivation and manipulation of his image and message by those who are enemies of the Catholic church. Because of his warm and welcoming style, Pope Francis is being hailed as a progressive, and those who oppose the Catholic faith will use Pope Francis to promote their own agenda.
The Pope’s human warmth and joyful message is being portrayed as no more than human kindliness and the sort of bland inclusiveness beloved by secularists. At the same time those who disagree with the fullness of Catholic teaching ignore the heart of Pope Francis’ message--which is a call for all people to turn away from their sin and seek a loving and living encounter with Christ the Lord.
We should therefore ask why Pope Francis is Time Magazine’s Person of the Year. Is it part of the continued attempt to embrace the Pope’s method while ignoring his message? In this way do the media negate the power of the message with a smile and betray the man with a kiss? If this is what is going on, one hopes that it is being done unconsciously by people who simply don’t know any better.
However, instead of focussing on the negative we applaud Time Magazine’s choice of Pope Francis for Person of the Year, and take this opportunity to explain why he is so popular.
Keep reading on the next page