On December 30, the State of Israel announced that beginning in 2014, the government would pay for pay for all abortions
performed on women between the ages of 20 and 33, without exception and without regard to reason. The Israeli government already provides widespread abortion subsidies to women under 20 and over 40, but the new policy represents a dramatic departure even for a country with notoriously lenient abortion laws. “It was brought to our attention that there is a large group of women between 20 and 40 who, for various reasons – financial or reasons of secrecy – do not terminate pregnancies,” said Dr. Jonathan Helevy, head of the government committee that decides which procedures or pharmaceuticals to fund. Halevy said the government hopes to fund all abortions in the near future.Abortion is legal in Israel up until the moment of birth, and girls under 17 do not need parental consent. All women seeking abortions are obliged to obtain prior approval from a government committee, which gives the go-ahead 98.6% of the time. Still, the requirement that women get state permission has fostered the growth of a large, private and illegal abortion industry in the Jewish state. According to the Israeli pro-life group, Be’ad Chaim
, about one in four Israeli children are aborted every year, including those terminated in illegal private clinics. That 25% rate puts Israel slightly below China (26%) and just above the United States (23%). An estimated 2 million Israeli children have been aborted since Israel’s founding in 1948. The country has a population of 8 million.American pro-life and pro-family groups responded to the December announcement with little comment or condemnation. Lifesitenews.com chose to run an anodyne report
on the policy change, but not editorialize. The Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), whose mission is to “defend life and family at international institutions and to publicize the debate,” had nothing to say. The same was true for National Right to Life, Priests for Life, the American Life League and most others.Dr. Charmaine Yoest, head of Americans United for Life, did note in a statement
that “Unborn lives are rich with possibilities and worth saving and government should never be used to harm life and harm women.” The Family Research Council’s Arina Grossu agreed, saying, “No government should invest its money into killing its own citizens.” She also predicted that Israeli government funding would only result in more abortions in that country.” On the other hand, Liberty Counsel, “an international nonprofit litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family,” told its members
on January 9, “there has never been a more critical time for you to show your support to Israel and its Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu!” Either someone at Liberty Counsel missed the story or abortion in Israel just doesn’t matter.Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ), chair of the Congressional Pro-Life Caucus, declined to comment, but perhaps that’s understandable. In addition to his pro-life work, Smith is a charter member of the Israel Allies Foundation (IAF). Formed in 2006, IAF is a kind of institutional link between the US Congress and the Israeli Knesset. Smith, a Catholic, is also the House sponsor of a wonderful bill titled “The Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2013.” The measure is intended introduce much-needed transparency to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. If passed, Smith’s bill would force insurers to notify their insured whether abortion is or isn’t covered, and whether any surcharges or other fees are used to pay for abortions. In presenting his bill, Smith wrote, “Obamacare’s abortion mandate violates federal law and makes taxpayers complicit in the culture of death.”Smith is right, of course. American taxpayers should not be put in the position of underwriting the culture of death. But if that’s true of Obamacare – and it is – then shouldn’t it be true for American foreign aid? Israel receives about $3 billion each year from American taxpayers. About 74% of that is returned to the United States in the form of contracts with American weapons manufacturers. But given the fungible nature of money, and since Israel would buy weapons with money from its own treasury in the absence of aid, the current arrangement amounts to American funding of Israeli abortions.That’s the argument the pro-life community has made for years
regarding taxpayer support for Planned Parenthood. In 2012 for instance, Planned Parenthood received $542 million in taxpayer dollars for services ranging from cancer screenings and breast exams to birth control. Congress bars Planned Parenthood from using any of that money for abortion services, but critics rightly note that such funding assists in maintaining the human and physical infrastructure in which abortions take place.The same could be said for aid to Israel, where thanks to the government’s abortion license, an estimated 50,000 unborn Jewish children will perish this year, bringing the total since the founding of Israel to nearly two million
. And that doesn’t include the thousands of abortions performed on women who cross into Israel from Palestine, where the procedure is illegal except to save the life of the mother. The State of Israel is a liberal democracy and a long-time American ally in the Middle East. It is also rigorously secular, despite the fevered imaginations of American Christians, who confuse the modern Jewish State with Eretz Yisrael, the biblical Land of Israel. As a modern, secular state, Israel has decided to permit abortion on demand and fund it from the public purse. American taxpayers augment that purse annually, which makes us complicit in the culture of death, whether we like it or not.The website of the Israeli pro-life organization, “Friends of Efrat
,” has a lovely story about the origin of its name:
“According to the Midrash, when Pharaoh commanded the midwives to kill all newborn Jewish male babies, he was speaking to the Hebrew midwives Yocheved and Miriam. The question arises: how could Pharaoh ask Hebrew midwives to kill Hebrew babies – why didn't he ask this of Egyptian midwives? How could he think Hebrew midwives would be willing to kill Jewish babies? Like Yocheved and Miriam, American Catholics should resist Pharoah, whether here or in Israel. We could begin by asking why our tax dollars are permitted to underwrite his latest assault on human dignity.
“Pharaoh’s answer, as stated to the midwives, was: “What kind of life is it anyway to be in poverty and bondage?” But Yocheved and Miriam didn't listen and did everything they could to promote Jewish childbirth in Egypt, as it is written: “and they saved the children” (Exodus 1:17).
“After these events, Miriam was given the additional name Efrat, since the word "Efrat" has the same root found in the Hebrew words “pru u’revu” which means, “be fruitful and multiply.””