Religion June 23, 2014

Age of Sin

Why is Catholicism in decline?

David Carlin
SHARES
COMMENTS
First one is free... so are the rest. Daily.



By submitting above you agree the Aleteia privacy policy
Like Aleteia

David Carlin
June 23, 2014
Pietromassimo Pasqui
One of my sociological preoccupations is concern for the question: Why has Catholicism gone into steep decline in the last half-century or so in the most modernized and prosperous countries in the world -- that is, the United States, Canada, and much of Europe?

The most popular answer to this question is that the decline is totally the result of Vatican II. But I reject that answer. If Vatican II played a role in the decline, it was only a very small role. The important factors are to be found elsewhere. There may be a hundred of these factors, but one might be more prevalent than the others.

Christianity is a salvation religion, and it offers to save us from is sin. According to the Christian story, God became incarnate in Jesus Christ, and then suffered and died on the cross, to save us from our sins. The premise upon which all this is grounded is, of course, that we humans are sinners -- very serious sinners.

However, what if we are not sinners? Then it would follow that we don’t need salvation from sin. And if we are sinners but don’t feel that we are sinners, then we won’t feel the need of salvation. So Christianity will make no sense to us.

By and large we modern men and women do not feel that we are sinners, at least not in any serious sense. Oh, we admit that we are not perfect. Any one of us can draw up a list of our imperfections: we sometimes eat or drink a little too much; we often exercise too little; we don’t read enough good books; we commit little acts of impoliteness from time to time; and so on. But no really big sins -- certainly no sins that are great enough for the Creator and Sustainer of the universe to become man and suffer and die in order to atone for our great wickedness.

We admit that some humans truly are very wicked -- Hitler, Stalin, Osama bin Laden, Charles Manson, and a few others. But they are very untypical of humanity. The rest of us, normal human beings, are utterly horrified by the crimes of Hitler and company.  This is proof -- isn’t it? -- that we ourselves are not very wicked. So we don’t need salvation from sin. And we don’t need a religion that offers this salvation.  No wonder Catholicism is in decline.

There was a time, centuries ago, when people in the world of Christendom (the world that we today call the “Western world” -- for we can no longer with any accuracy call it the Christian world) had a strong sense of their sinfulness, and thus a strong sense that they needed to be saved from their sins. In that atmosphere Catholicism flourished.

Even when the great Protestant Reformation came along (better called, perhaps, the Protestant Revolution), this strong sense of sin persisted. The leading early Protestants, e.g., Luther and Calvin, had as strong a sense of human sin as did any Catholic -- maybe an even stronger sense.

But things changed in the 18th century. The idea that human nature is inclined to evil was gradually replaced by the opposite idea that human nature is inclined to good. The thinker who expressed this idea better than anybody else was Jean-Jacques Rousseau, often called “the father of Romanticism.” But if Rousseau was a powerful influence on 18th century thought and feeling (and he certainly was), this is because he expressed in persuasive words what everybody -- or at least vast numbers of people -- were already on the verge of thinking and feeling. 

This substitution of the modern idea of human goodness for the Catholic idea of Original Sin has had, it must be admitted, some very important good consequences. For one thing, it facilitated the coming of democracy; for if humans are good, then we can trust them to govern themselves. For another, it has given us great confidence in our own creative powers, leading to tremendous economic and technological progress. But, and this also has to be admitted, undermined the raison d’etre of Catholicism.
Click here to view exclusive coverage of the latest news and commentary on the Synod

One of my sociological preoccupations is concern for the question: Why has Catholicism gone into steep decline in the last half-century or so in the most modernized and prosperous countries in the world -- that is, the United States, Canada, and much of Europe?

The most popular answer to this question is that the decline is totally the result of Vatican II. But I reject that answer. If Vatican II played a role in the decline, it was only a very small role. The important factors are to be found elsewhere. There may be a hundred of these factors, but one might be more prevalent than the others.

Christianity is a salvation religion, and it offers to save us from is sin. According to the Christian story, God became incarnate in Jesus Christ, and then suffered and died on the cross, to save us from our sins. The premise upon which all this is grounded is, of course, that we humans are sinners -- very serious sinners.

However, what if we are not sinners? Then it would follow that we don’t need salvation from sin. And if we are sinners but don’t feel that we are sinners, then we won’t feel the need of salvation. So Christianity will make no sense to us.

By and large we modern men and women do not feel that we are sinners, at least not in any serious sense. Oh, we admit that we are not perfect. Any one of us can draw up a list of our imperfections: we sometimes eat or drink a little too much; we often exercise too little; we don’t read enough good books; we commit little acts of impoliteness from time to time; and so on. But no really big sins -- certainly no sins that are great enough for the Creator and Sustainer of the universe to become man and suffer and die in order to atone for our great wickedness.

We admit that some humans truly are very wicked -- Hitler, Stalin, Osama bin Laden, Charles Manson, and a few others. But they are very untypical of humanity. The rest of us, normal human beings, are utterly horrified by the crimes of Hitler and company.  This is proof -- isn’t it? -- that we ourselves are not very wicked. So we don’t need salvation from sin. And we don’t need a religion that offers this salvation.  No wonder Catholicism is in decline.

There was a time, centuries ago, when people in the world of Christendom (the world that we today call the “Western world” -- for we can no longer with any accuracy call it the Christian world) had a strong sense of their sinfulness, and thus a strong sense that they needed to be saved from their sins. In that atmosphere Catholicism flourished.

Even when the great Protestant Reformation came along (better called, perhaps, the Protestant Revolution), this strong sense of sin persisted. The leading early Protestants, e.g., Luther and Calvin, had as strong a sense of human sin as did any Catholic -- maybe an even stronger sense.

But things changed in the 18th century. The idea that human nature is inclined to evil was gradually replaced by the opposite idea that human nature is inclined to good. The thinker who expressed this idea better than anybody else was Jean-Jacques Rousseau, often called “the father of Romanticism.” But if Rousseau was a powerful influence on 18th century thought and feeling (and he certainly was), this is because he expressed in persuasive words what everybody -- or at least vast numbers of people -- were already on the verge of thinking and feeling. 

This substitution of the modern idea of human goodness for the Catholic idea of Original Sin has had, it must be admitted, some very important good consequences. For one thing, it facilitated the coming of democracy; for if humans are good, then we can trust them to govern themselves. For another, it has given us great confidence in our own creative powers, leading to tremendous economic and technological progress. But, and this also has to be admitted, undermined the raison d’etre of Catholicism.


Is there any chance that the old Catholic view of human sinfulness can be revived? Yes, if we enter another age of wickedness, like the age of Hitler and Stalin. It was relatively easy to believe in Original Sin during the era of Hitler and Stalin, who offered daily demonstrations of that wickedness. But is there no other way of recovering our feeling that we need salvation from sin?

It all depends on what we mean by sin. If sin is a matter of sensational immorality (murder, rape, robbery, embezzlement, the sexual molestation of children, self-destruction through drug and alcohol abuse, etc.), then most of us are not sinners, and we don’t need Christian redemption. But if sin is an absence of holiness, then we all need redemption, for God alone is truly holy. We humans are not holy, and cannot make ourselves holy. We can become holy -- become saved from our sinful state of unholiness -- only by the gift of Christ. 

The root problem, I suggest, is that we moderns don’t really believe in God. At most we semi-believe. But if we truly believed in God, we would have a strong sense of the holiness of God; and if we had a strong sense of God’s holiness, we would have a correspondingly strong sense of our own lack of holiness (that is, our sinfulness); and this in turn would make us feel a need for salvation from sin. 

In sum, Catholicism will revive once a strong and genuine belief in God revives.


David Carlin, a professor of sociology and philosophy at the Community College of Rhode Island at Newport, is the author of The Decline and Fall of the Catholic Church in America.
Don't miss each day's best stories
Sign up for our free email newsletter



Comments
Don't miss each day's best stories
Sign up for our free email newsletter

; ;
Don't miss each day's best stories
Sign up for our free email newsletter



Become a Partner